SPEECH BY LN
SISULU MINISTER OF HOUSING AT THE
OCCASION OF THE 2006 WOMEN’S BUILD
INITIATIVE
14 August
2006
Orange Farm
Master of Ceremonies
MEC for Housing in Gauteng, Nomvula
Mokonyane
Your Worship, Executive Mayor Amos
Masondo
Officials from both the province and
the national Department
Friends
Comrades
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Again this year, the
focus on women has brought us here
to highlight the role that women can
play in the rebuilding and the
reconstruction of society. As was
established last year it has brought
us to one of the areas in need of
enhanced efforts aimed poverty
alleviation; only this year has to
be different because we celebrate
the achievement of women of the
age-group we are building for
today.
We owe what
we have today as women to the quiet
courage and determination of these
women. Today we give back to these
women 50 houses: a symbolic gesture
of the distance we have traveled in
time where ironically we have stood
still in relation to the real
tangible benefits for the quality of
life of this age-group. I feel
privileged that I have the
opportunity plough back my
gratitude.
We should ensure that
no woman reaches the age of 89
before she can own a home. For a
country like ours this should not
ever happen.
The success we
achieved in 2005 in partnership with
Women For Housing when we built
fifteen houses in Protea South
demonstrated to us that up-scaling
was possible and achievable. Thus,
for Orange Farm we will build 50
houses that are for the benefit
elderly women. As part of this event
50 women from Women for Housing will
receive training to ensure skills
development for women constructors.
Furthermore, we are here with
additional partners in the form of
Thubelisha and the National Housing
Builders Registration Council. The
Gauteng Provincial Department is
joining us for yet another event.
It is good to be here
at Orange Farm to start the second
Women’s Build. You all know that the
people of Orange Farm are known to
be very pro-active in development.
They work closely with the
municipality to bring much of the
development that we see around this
venue. Though it might not seem like
much, I think we need to acknowledge
what the community here has been
able to achieve.
Statistics indicate
that in 2002 this area had a
population of 350 000, with very
little development. Shacks abound
here majorly due to an increase in
the number of farm workers who are
taking up settlement here after they
are laid off. Thus, the settlement
is the biggest and most populous in
the country. In addition, unlike
others, the settlement also has the
highest number of gravel roads in
the country. Consequently, crime
levels in 2002 were high including
unemployment and poverty. The City
of Johannesburg now estimates that
crime levels have dropped, in
particular serious crime that
affected women mostly such as rape.
Partly, this is due to the
initiatives that had been taken by
community members.
I am told that the
keen interest they have taken in
their own development has resulted
in large amounts of development
funding being channeled here. Thus,
there is an ongoing housing
development program taking place
through the Peoples Housing Process
and where 250 housing units are
being built in Extension 1. I am
told that a support centre is
already up and running; that a new
sewerage system is being built; a
multi-purpose centre that includes a
swimming pool is on the way
including a library; and that a
one-stop shop for information on
municipal services is also being
built.
These are the kinds
of activities wherein women
participate that define our age of
hope. Women are key in influencing
changes in society.
They are key in
helping resolve the myriad problems
and challenges presently confronting
us. Aware about the impact they
could make they therefore are
finding new forms of organization to
highlight their role. Hence,
formations such as Women for Housing
and the recently launched
Progressive Women Movement, in
Bloemfontein. All of this is in part
attributable to the fact that
despite achievements in the last
decades in understanding issues
related to political economy, urban
planning and design – all of which
have major contributions to concerns
relating to sustainable development
– those that are key in shaping the
form that cities and towns take
remained largely ignored. Now women
are increasingly finding avenues to
raise their voices and organize.
It is no wonder
therefore that women consistently
identify themselves with the cause
of the poorest of the poor. They can
relate the poverty of the others to
their own. They can identify with
the powerlessness of others when
they themselves are in a similar
circumstance. And it is this
compassion that enables them to do
work for others who are in similar
position.
It is thus through
constant organization and
mobilization that women play the
critical role of injecting greater
sensitivity to urban planners and
designers, architects, geographers,
economists and land surveyors
political decision-makers to issues
affecting the poorest of the poor.
As our urban areas
continue to be recipients of ever
larger volumes of migration it will
be women who will sensitise policies
to issues of secure land tenure,
gendered land-use planning and
administration including forms of
integration with the rest of
society. This imperative is not only
the result of the recognition that
women are the most who are migrating
from rural areas in comparison to
men. Nor should it be seen as simply
as realization that female-headed
households are on the increase. For
purposes of policy-making and
understanding it is a posture that
posits that woman’s
access to and control over land,
housing and property is a
determining factor in the nature of
their living conditions. For
economic security and survival,
women deeply rely on land, housing
and property.
In confronting this
challenge, we are faced of course by
the reality that a significant
portion of these resources we need
are in the hands of the private
sector. Hence, our continued efforts
aimed at seeking collaboration with
the private sector through in
particular the public private
partnerships. These initiatives
however also present their own
challenges to women since the unlike
the public sector our private sector
remains largely indifferent to
gender issues. Their participation
in events, particularly those that
are nationally organized is of
course not a problem. It is in
actual demonstration of commitment
to gender specific issues such as
integration that you would find
commitment by the private sector
lacking.
The state therefore
always leads, albeit, with
insufficient resources and capacity.
Our initiative at
forming a land-acquisition vehicle
must be seen in this context.
Through it, we will enable the state
to amass appropriately located land
that would serve both the social and
economic needs of the poor. I am
hoping that by the time we repeat
the Women’s Build initiative in 2007
land that would have been identified
and allocated by the land vehicle
would be used. This is land, I
believe, that would lead not only to
increased access to housing but
would also enable the integration of
women into the rest of society.
Against this
background, I would like to thank
everyone who saw it necessary to
come out and support this
initiative. This is a critical
initiative that serves two purposes
of giving houses to those that do
not have them and highlighting our
role as women. Hence, our launching
at the same time of the
Guidelines on
Mainstreaming Gender in Housing and
Human Settlement.
With our mid-term
review we have had to gauge how far
we have come in our efforts to
empower the poor. In housing we are
proposing a new approach to how we
empower the poor. We all recognize
that women are at the bottom of the
pile. It goes without saying
therefore that if we aim at
alleviating the poverty of the
poorest of the poor we are
essentially talking about women. Our
poverty alleviation strategies
therefore should aim at women.
This, being such a
significant milestone in what the
women can do for themselves, there
could not be a better time to start
so that we can make a difference in
the lives of the women who made all
of this possible.
We will be
commissioning research with a view
to making changes to our laws to
ensure that the main beneficiaries
of the state’s efforts to house our
people are actually women, some
affirmative action for women.
Further, the research will
investigate the possibility that
where a couple are the beneficiaries
of our efforts, upon dissolution
(divorce) of that marriage, the
house automatically reverts to the
woman.
We are in the process
of auditing and compiling our
waiting list. We would want to make
sure that as we do that we ensure
that we prioritise the needs of
women with particular emphasis on
the elderly, the sick and also that
most vulnerable group; namely,
child-headed households. In this
case we already have been in
discussions with ABSA Bank to see
how we can ensure that our laws
allow children in child-headed
households to legally own their
homes.
In reiterating
therefore what already I have spoken
about the Guidelines seek to raise
the level of participation by
women in housing delivery. They seek
to infuse housing with the critical
understanding of the specific
housing needs of women and to accord
women greater access to resources.
They will assist the department and
the role players in Housing and
Human Settlements in mainstreaming
gender in their day to day
activities. They will ensure that
the programmes and projects planned
and implemented at national,
provincial and local level take into
considerations the different housing
needs of women and men.
In being here you
have showed that you understand the
need for the creation of these
linkages that are entailed in the
Guidelines. I thank you for that and
for your support.
I also would like to
thank Thubelisha and the National
Homebuilders Registration Council
for their tremendous support
including Women for Housing. Our
partnership is strengthening setting
new trends and benchmarks as we
proceed. I am thankful that you
agreed to form part of that process.
To my staff from the
Department: this is our time for
delivery. I am glad that you have
come to realize that and resolved to
show that commitment through the
arrangement of this event. To
Gauteng: thank you for being with us
all the time.
I thank you.
|